3. 
CASTELVECCHIO MUSEUM 

 CARLO SCARPA 

THRESHOLD


KEY CONCEPT

In 1958, Carlo Scarpa was confronted with the restoration of the Museo di Castelvecchio in Verona, Italy. This was a 14th century fortress in the west of the city. The complex had overgone series of remediations over the years. In 1957, Scarpa was appointed as the new architect for the museum, with the position to reinvent various spaces.
Scarpa’s practice is reminiscent of ‘Kintsugi’, an ancient Japanese technique of repairing pottery with a gold glue that becomes part of its new identity (Murphy 1990 ). Scarpa’s interventions at the Castelvecchio are based on relations that Scarpa himself invents for the layers he selects (Murphy 1990 ). He states, “to allow it (the old fragment) to maintain its own identity, its own history…, you increase the tension between the new and the old” (Murphy 1990 ). Manipulating layers of different scales and properties, he critically selects what to erase and what to retain, which leads to his selective demolition, followed by his creative addition (Murphy 1990 ). By extending those layers of life to present, Scarpa achieves not only to save traces of a wall, a political figure or an event, but to immortalize all significance and memory those traces hold, keeping them active and important for the present (Murphy 1990 ). With this notion of layering and reinventing traditional embellishments, Scarpa’s most celebrated works are generally his immensely detailed threshold conditions, between stairs, façade openings, landscape treatment and balustrades. The key concept becomes the idea of threshold, symbolising the barrier space that is located for the separation of volumes (Alakavuk 2018 ). Scarpa’s intricately designed and carefully detailed balustrades define threshold conditions by celebrating qualities of traditional Byzantine bronze fabrication and the neutrality of timber. Contemporary ideologies of architecture often inspired by the De Stijl movement are poetically engaged in a postmodern treatment with traditional technique. Till Boettger notes that thresholds are spatial conditions that create openings in boundaries allowing for movement and transition in space (Boettger 2014). In the work at Castelvecchio, thresholds can be seen to resonate with the tension between old and new and its resolution is through an array of details arising from the peculiarity of individual locations (Murphy 1990 )



SELECTED DESIGN ELEMENT

The selected design element is the handrail associated with the pavement window. A section of the moat wall excavated in 1962 continues under the floor of the fifth room. Scarpa incorporated it as an exhibit in into the sculpture gallery by glazing a section of the floor. The low protective handrails around the window are formed of steel uprights with bronze castings and rings with teak rails. I intend to model the element of the handrail, focusing on the junctions between the post, links and rails. Scarpa’s sketches of the connections convey how he severs the proposed link so that the final design is of four independent rails swinging from eight uprights. The richness of the detailing and the density of design defies the lack of ornate specificity in much of the twentieth century modernism.
This element resonates with the key concept and reiterates the notion of the tectonic resembled through the threshold. Scarpa’s decision to integrate tectonic architecture into the Modern Movement resulted in the development of a new and authentic language in architecture; the language that produces space and mass as a result of the tectonic assembly of objects (Albertini 1988). This tension between old and new is celebrated in a poetic balance in this detail. The verticality of the uprights is supported by an angled turn at the base which continues as a vector animating the threshold boundary. As the uprights terminate with the rail, they are combined in a tectonic junction, lightly held by a single ring through a chain connection. Wrapping the external bounds of the teak rail is a bronze member, chamfered on two faces. This detailed element celebrates the marriage of old and new, embodied through material quality and tectonic consideration. 


HOW IS THE KEY CONCEPT REFLECTED IN THE DESIGN STUDIO?

The notion of the threshold as a definition of boundary separation in conjunction with the tectonics in architecture are crucial concepts driving the importance of detailing in design practice. The threshold is not only the entrance of the building, it has variations of meanings too. Expressing the meaning of the threshold into architectural design is not an easy practice. By using Scarpa’s details of thresholds and tectonics, a designer can from a basis of their own understanding of the meaning of the threshold. Some can be considered as a separator that divides spaces into zones while some may be considered as an intersection, a gathering point. Thresholds can be perceived to divide architectural designs into zones representing public, semi public and private areas (Alakavuk 2018 ). The threshold can also be a connection element for different functions. They combine old places or areas with new ones by the help of the threshold. Taking account of the threshold with tectonic condition in the design process affects the main idea and sometimes the concept. By understanding the aim of the threshold, this can inform the architectural design with ease. Scarpa is often celebrated as prominent personality in treatment of landscape conditions. The threshold also creates the connectivity between nature and the built environment. Finally, thresholds transfer air and provide access between spaces, aiding in the procession throughout the design.
Scarpa engaged in a practice of layering elements and detailing iterations and variations of tectonic principles, arriving at informed decisions which resulted in elegantly robust architectural elements which are compositionally gratifying. This practice iterates the importance of tectonics in conceptualisation. We can also take from Scarpa’s details, the celebration of engaging in an investigation between contemporary and tradition, utilising the past to encapsulate the present.  


GEOMETRICAL DESCRIPTION OF THE SHAPE

The geometries in this detailed element are balanced between robust materials, subtle textural qualities, junctions and joints. In his sketches, careful calculations make evident the intricate considerations of tectonic junctions through an understanding of balance through symmetry and composition. Gravity is achieved through the linearity of axes, as the uprights are set into the base at a 90-degree angle, secured and tied by bolts into the base plate. The upright returns vertically reaching 800mm, continuing at another 90- degree turn where it is dismissed and is met by a bronze eye which is harmoniously set into the upright. Dangling off the eye is a single chain link which drops to the rail. The edge detail is a cylindrical edge component forming the junction to teak rail member.
Each rail member stands upright at perpendicular arrangement, capturing an intricate balance of tectonic detail, material contrast, textural quality and mechanical intelligence.  

PROPOSED SCALE, MATERIAL AND TECHNIQUE
SCALE: 1:1 – the element is best described as an elegant vision of real scale.   
MATERIAL:
-        Timber Dowel used for railing.
-        Bronze for eye and links
-        (recycled steel) for uprights. Alternatively construct uprights out of timber and paint them with a matt finish to represent iron/steel texture (based on technique and availability)
TECHNIQUE:
-        Majority use of metal workshop
-        Solder/ weld metal elements
-        Magnabend
-        English wheel
-        Sander
-        Bandsaw
-        Metal shaping tools – hammer etc.

TIME COMMITMENT AND BUDGET
TIME: 2-3 full days – 18-21 hours.
BUDGET - $40 Relying on found objects. 

REFERENCES 

Alakavuk, Ebru. 2018 . "Threshold Approaches to Architectural Design." SHS Web of Conferences 1.
Boettger, Till. 2014. Threshold Spaces: Transitions in Architecture Analysis and Design Tools . Basel: Birkhäuser.
Murphy, Richard. 1990 . Carlo Scarpa and the Castelvecchio . London : Butterworth Architecture .



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

DOCUMENTATION PROCESSES

FABRICATION 2